[PATCH v3 1/3] clk: asm9260: use new helper for fixed rate clock creation
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Thu Sep 15 23:13:37 PDT 2022
On 30/08/2022 08:25, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 08-07-22, 16:54, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> The __clk_hw_register_fixed_rate() is an internal API, which is better
>> not to be called directly. Add new helper to create fixed rate clocks
>> using parent clock accuracy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/clk-asm9260.c | 6 ++----
>> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-asm9260.c b/drivers/clk/clk-asm9260.c
>> index bacebd457e6f..0609b661ff5a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-asm9260.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-asm9260.c
>> @@ -276,10 +276,8 @@ static void __init asm9260_acc_init(struct device_node *np)
>>
>> /* TODO: Convert to DT parent scheme */
>> ref_clk = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
>> - hw = __clk_hw_register_fixed_rate(NULL, NULL, pll_clk,
>> - ref_clk, NULL, NULL, 0, rate, 0,
>> - CLK_FIXED_RATE_PARENT_ACCURACY);
>> -
>> + hw = clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_accuracy(NULL, pll_clk, ref_clk,
>> + 0, rate);
>
> Should this not be described in DT instead, resolve the todo :-)
>
I wanted to abstain from changing the asm9260 too much, but probably
we'd have to do that.
>> if (IS_ERR(hw))
>> panic("%pOFn: can't register REFCLK. Check DT!", np);
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>> index 72d937c03a3e..659ef5a77246 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>> @@ -439,6 +439,20 @@ struct clk *clk_register_fixed_rate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>> __clk_hw_register_fixed_rate((dev), NULL, (name), NULL, NULL, \
>> (parent_data), NULL, (flags), \
>> (fixed_rate), (fixed_accuracy), 0)
>> +/**
>> + * clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_accuracy - register fixed-rate clock with
>> + * the clock framework
>> + * @dev: device that is registering this clock
>> + * @name: name of this clock
>> + * @parent_name: name of clock's parent
>> + * @flags: framework-specific flags
>> + * @fixed_rate: non-adjustable clock rate
>> + */
>> +#define clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_accuracy(dev, name, parent_name, \
>> + flags, fixed_rate) \
>> + __clk_hw_register_fixed_rate((dev), NULL, (name), (parent_name), \
>> + NULL, NULL, (flags), (fixed_rate), 0, \
>> + CLK_FIXED_RATE_PARENT_ACCURACY)
>>
>> void clk_unregister_fixed_rate(struct clk *clk);
>> void clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(struct clk_hw *hw);
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list