[PATCH 12/14] phy: qcom-qmp-combo: rename common-register pointers

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 14/11/2022 15:54, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 02:31:27PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 11/11/2022 12:24, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> The common registers are shared by the USB and DP parts of the PHY so
>>> drop the misleading "dp" prefix from the corresponding pointers.
>>>
>>> Note that the "DP" prefix could also be dropped from the corresponding
>>> defines, but leave that in place for now.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro at kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-combo.c | 24 +++++++++++------------
>>>    1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>>
>> Note regarding the last phrase: I'd suggest leaving the DP prefix in
>> register names, it makes it easier to visually note & verify the
>> register block.
> 
> My point is that "DP" was never part of the COM register block name. The
> confusion likely comes from the vendor driver naming these defines along
> the lines of
> 
> 	USB3_DP_COM_POWER_DOWN_CTRL
> 
> Here "USB3_DP" is the common prefix for all defines that apply to both
> "parts" of the PHY so the corresponding Linux define
> 
> 	QPHY_V3_DP_COM_POWER_DOWN_CTRL
> 
> should either include "USB3" or drop "DP".

My thought was that we already have too many _COM_ defines in the qmp 
headers. Having QPHY_Vn_COM_something would make it too easy to mix it 
with QSERDES_Vn_COM_foo. Thus I'd vote to leave DP_COM prefix in place. 
While it might be not fully accurate, it serves the point of identifying 
the register block.

> 
> This becomes more apparent on SC8280XP where the corresponding define
> is:
> 
> 	USB43DP_COM_POWER_DOWN_CTRL

I'd still use something like QPHY_V10_DP_COM_POWER_DOWN_CTRL here.

> 
> Johan

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry