[PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: phy: Fix UniPhier SATA controller node names in example
Vinod Koul
vkoul at kernel.org
Sat Nov 5 00:34:48 PDT 2022
On 02-11-22, 08:14, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> On 2022/11/02 4:31, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 4:10 AM Kunihiko Hayashi
> > <hayashi.kunihiko at socionext.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > On 2022/10/29 4:38, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 01:49:20PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> > > > > The word "glue" is ambiguous for the controller node name. Should put
> > > > > "sata-controller" instead of "ahci-glue" on the controller node.
> > > > > And rename a phy node to "sata-phy".
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko at socionext.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml | 4
> > > > > ++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.yaml
> > > > > index a3cd45acea28..89b8b133777a 100644
> > > > > ---
> > > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.
> > > > yaml
> > > > > +++
> > > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/socionext,uniphier-ahci-phy.
> > > > yaml
> > > > > @@ -117,14 +117,14 @@ additionalProperties: false
> > > > >
> > > > > examples:
> > > > > - |
> > > > > - ahci-glue at 65700000 {
> > > > > + sata-controller at 65700000 {
> > > >
> > > > But is this really the SATA controller aka AHCI?
> > > >
> > > > In cases where we don't have a standardized name, I don't think it makes
> > > > sense changing node names from one non-standard name to another.
> > >
> > > I see. This can't be named generic, so this change will drop.
> > > And "sata-phy" in the same way.
> >
> > I think sata-phy is fine. It may not be added, but usb3-phy or
> > pcie-phy are common already.
> I understand. But of cource "phy" is also common, so I defer the change
> from "phy" to "sata-phy".
Should it not be just phy at xxx does it really need to be foo-phy?
--
~Vinod
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list