[PATCH 10/11] usb: host: xhci-tegra: Add Tegra234 XHCI support

[Jon Hunter]

On 28/10/2022 14:39, Thierry Reding wrote:

...

>> +static const struct tegra_xusb_soc tegra234_soc = {
>> +	.firmware = "nvidia/tegra234/xusb.bin",
>> +	.supply_names = tegra194_supply_names,
>> +	.num_supplies = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra194_supply_names),
>> +	.phy_types = tegra194_phy_types,
>> +	.num_types = ARRAY_SIZE(tegra194_phy_types),
>> +	.context = &tegra186_xusb_context,
>> +	.ports = {
>> +		.usb3 = { .offset = 0, .count = 4, },
>> +		.usb2 = { .offset = 4, .count = 4, },
>> +	},
>> +	.scale_ss_clock = false,
>> +	.has_ipfs = false,
>> +	.otg_reset_sspi = false,
>> +	.ops = &tegra234_ops,
>> +	.mbox = {
>> +		.cmd = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_CMD,
>> +		.data_in = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_DATA_IN,
>> +		.data_out = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_DATA_OUT,
>> +		.owner = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_MBOX_OWNER,
>> +		.smi_intr = XUSB_BAR2_ARU_SMI_INTR,
>> +	},
>> +	.lpm_support = true,
>> +	.has_bar2 = true,
>> +	.has_ifr = true,
>> +};
>> +MODULE_FIRMWARE("nvidia/tegra234/xusb.bin");
> 
> Can you prepare a patch to add this firmware to the linux-firmware
> repository? I don't see it there yet.


Actually, we should remove the MODULE_FIRMWARE completely for Tegra234. 
Per the commit message the variable 'has_ifr' is used to indicate if the 
firmware is loaded by calling request_firmware() or via these IFR 
registers. I wonder if we need this 'has_ifr' variable if we should just 
avoid setting the 'firmware' variable for Tegra234 and use this instead 
of the 'has_ifr'?

Jon

-- 
nvpublic