[PATCH 1/2] phy: samsung: phy-exynos-pcie: sanitize init/power_on callbacks

Vinod Koul vkoul at kernel.org
Fri Jul 15 04:35:30 PDT 2022


On 12-07-22, 15:12, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 11:55:23AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On 29-06-22, 00:04, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > > The exynos-pcie driver called phy_power_on() and then phy_init() for some
> > > historical reasons. However the generic PHY framework assumes that the
> > > proper sequence is to call phy_init() first, then phy_power_on(). The
> > > operations done by both functions should be considered as one action and
> > > as such they are called by the exynos-pcie driver (without doing anything
> > > between them). The initialization is just a sequence of register writes,
> > > which cannot be altered, without breaking the hardware operation.
> > > 
> > > To match the generic PHY framework requirement, simply move all register
> > > writes to the phy_init()/phy_exit() and drop power_on()/power_off()
> > > callbacks. This way the driver will also work with the old (incorrect)
> > > PHY initialization call sequence.
> > 
> > Is the plan to merge thru pcie tree?
> 
> I guess these patches should go together.  I don't see any major
> exynos series pending, but I do have two minor pci-exynos.c patches in
> the queue.
> 
> If you ack it (after resolution of your question below) I'd be happy
> to take both if it doesn't cause trouble for you.

Done now.

-- 
~Vinod



More information about the linux-phy mailing list