[PATCH] driver core: platform: Rename platform_get_irq_optional() to platform_get_irq_silent()
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Wed Jan 19 12:55:09 PST 2022
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:47:06PM +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> On 1/19/22 9:51 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>>>> It'd certainly be good to name anything that doesn't correspond to one
> >>>>> of the existing semantics for the API (!) something different rather
> >>>>> than adding yet another potentially overloaded meaning.
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems we're (at least) three who agree about this. Here is a patch
> >>>> fixing the name.
> >>>
> >>> And similar number of people are on the other side.
> >>
> >> If someone already opposed to the renaming (and not only the name) I
> >> must have missed that.
> >>
> >> So you think it's a good idea to keep the name
> >> platform_get_irq_optional() despite the "not found" value returned by it
> >> isn't usable as if it were a normal irq number?
> >
> > I meant that on the other side people who are in favour of Sergey's patch.
> > Since that I commented already that I opposed the renaming being a standalone
> > change.
> >
> > Do you agree that we have several issues with platform_get_irq*() APIs?
> >
> > 1. The unfortunate naming
>
> Mmm, "what's in a name?"... is this the topmost prio issue?
The order is arbitrary.
> > 2. The vIRQ0 handling: a) WARN() followed by b) returned value 0
>
> This is the most severe issue, I think...
>
> > 3. The specific cookie for "IRQ not found, while no error happened" case
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list