[PATCH v8 2/4] dt-bindings: phy: rockchip: Add Naneng combo PHY bindings

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:15 AM Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao at rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> Add the compatible strings for the Naneng combo PHY found on rockchip SoC.
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao at rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244 at gmail.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v8: None
> Changes in v7:
> - remove u3otg0_port_en, u3otg1_port_en and pipe_sgmii_mac_sel
>
> Changes in v5:
> - modify description for ssc and ext-refclk
> - remove apb reset
>
> Changes in v4:
> - restyle
> - remove some minItems
> - add more properties
> - remove reset-names
> - move #phy-cells
> - add rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf
> - add rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix dtschema/dtc warnings/errors
>
>  .../phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.yaml      | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.yaml

This now fails in linux-next:

/builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.example.dt.yaml:
syscon at fdc50000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be
fixed:
 ['rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf', 'syscon'] is too short
 'rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3288-sgrf',
'rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf', 'rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf']
>From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml
/builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.example.dt.yaml:
syscon at fdc70000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be
fixed:
 ['rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf', 'syscon'] is too short
 'rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3288-sgrf',
'rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf', 'rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf']
>From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml


The problem appears to be that patch 1 was applied incorrectly and the
compatibles ended up in the wrong section (the one requiring
'simple-mfd'). Patch 1 probably conflicts as my bot will just skip the
patch if it conflicts which is why this had a different error report.

Rob