[PATCH v9 01/22] dt-bindings: mediatek,dpi: Add DP_INTF compatible

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:39:06AM +0200, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:
> From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> 
> DP_INTF is similar to DPI but does not have the exact same feature set
> or register layouts.
> 
> DP_INTF is the sink of the display pipeline that is connected to the
> DisplayPort controller and encoder unit. It takes the same clocks as
> DPI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet at baylibre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml       | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
> index dd2896a40ff0..2dba80ad3b18 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml
> @@ -4,16 +4,16 @@
>  $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml#
>  $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>  
> -title: mediatek DPI Controller Device Tree Bindings
> +title: mediatek DPI/DP_INTF Controller
>  
>  maintainers:
>    - CK Hu <ck.hu at mediatek.com>
>    - Jitao shi <jitao.shi at mediatek.com>
>  
>  description: |
> -  The Mediatek DPI function block is a sink of the display subsystem and
> -  provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a parallel
> -  output bus.
> +  The Mediatek DPI and DP_INTF function blocks are a sink of the display
> +  subsystem and provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a
> +  parallel output bus.
>  
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties:
>        - mediatek,mt8173-dpi
>        - mediatek,mt8183-dpi
>        - mediatek,mt8192-dpi
> +      - mediatek,mt8195-dpintf

It seems a bit weird to have all instances of DP_INTF with a separator
but the compatible doesn't have one?

Is there a reason to not use dp-intf?

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-phy/attachments/20220422/953d7c01/attachment.sig>