[PATCH 13/16] media: ti-vpe: csi2rx: Add CSI2RX support

[Tomi Valkeinen]

Hi,

On 30/03/2021 20:33, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> TI's J721E uses the Cadence CSI2RX and DPHY peripherals to facilitate
> capture over a CSI-2 bus.
> 
> The Cadence CSI2RX IP acts as a bridge between the TI specific parts and
> the CSI-2 protocol parts. TI then has a wrapper on top of this bridge
> called the SHIM layer. It takes in data from stream 0, repacks it, and
> sends it to memory over PSI-L DMA.
> 
> This driver acts as the "front end" to V4L2 client applications. It
> implements the required ioctls and buffer operations, passes the
> necessary calls on to the bridge, programs the SHIM layer, and performs
> DMA via the dmaengine API to finally return the data to a buffer
> supplied by the application.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav at ti.com>
> ---
>   MAINTAINERS                               |   7 +
>   drivers/media/platform/Kconfig            |  11 +
>   drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/Makefile    |   1 +
>   drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/ti-csi2rx.c | 964 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   4 files changed, 983 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/ti-csi2rx.c

Some quick comments:

"ti-vpe" directory is not correct, this has nothing to do with VPE. That 
said, the directory has already been abused by having CAL driver there, 
perhaps we should rename the directory just to "ti". But if we do that, 
I think we should have subdirs for cal, vpe and this new one.

"ti-csi2rx" is rather generic name. TI has had CSI-2 RX IPs before (CAL) 
and probably will also have new ones in the future. If there's no clear 
model name for the IP, as I think is the case here, it's probably best 
to just use the SoC model in the name. E.g. the DSS on J7 is "ti,j721e-dss".

This driver implements the legacy video API. I think it would be better 
(and easier to maintain) to only implement the media-controller API, 
unless you specifically need to support the legacy API for existing 
userspace.

  Tomi