Commits for 5.11 stable

[Vinod Koul]

On 02-03-21, 11:41, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:55:27PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > 
> > HI Greg,
> > 
> > On 02-03-21, 11:02, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 03:25:09PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > 
> > > > Please include these commits for 5.11 stable series
> > > > 
> > > > 9a8b9434c60f phy: mediatek: Add missing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE()
> > > > 25e3ee590f62 phy: phy-brcm-sata: remove unneeded semicolon
> > > > 6b46e60a6943 phy: USB_LGM_PHY should depend on X86
> > > > 36acd5e24e30 phy: lantiq: rcu-usb2: wait after clock enable
> > > > c188365402f6 phy: rockchip: emmc, add vendor prefix to dts properties
> > > > 88d9f40c4b71 devicetree: phy: rockchip-emmc optional add vendor prefix
> > > > aaf316de3bba phy: cpcap-usb: remove unneeded conversion to bool
> > > > 39961bd6b70e phy: rockchip-emmc: emmc_phy_init() always return 0
> > > 
> > > Why take these?
> > > 
> > > What problems do they solve?
> > 
> > Sorry I should have provided the context. I had sent these as fixes for
> > 5.11 but that was bit late so we merged it for 5.12 [1]
> 
> I still do not have any context :(

Please see the discussion we had in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210210091249.GC2774@vkoul-mobl.Dlink/

> > > How does 25e3ee590f62 meet the stable tree rules?

Sorry it doesn't. My mistake on picking this for fixes. Lets drop this
one

> And all of these really are needed for stable?  Again, how does this
> above commit qualify?

I relooked, expect this one, rest should be added for 5.11 stable.

Thanks
-- 
~Vinod