[GIT PULL]: Generic phy updates for v5.14

[Sergio Paracuellos]

Hi Greg,

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 9:21 AM Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:45:59AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > Hello Greg,
> >
> > Please pull to receive Generic phy subsystem updates for v5.14
> >
> > The following changes since commit 6efb943b8616ec53a5e444193dccf1af9ad627b5:
> >
> >   Linux 5.13-rc1 (2021-05-09 14:17:44 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/phy/linux-phy.git tags/phy-for-5.14
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to f7eedcb8539ddcbb6fe7791f1b4ccf43f905c72f:
> >
> >   phy: ti: dm816x: Fix the error handling path in 'dm816x_usb_phy_probe() (2021-06-21 12:04:18 +0530)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > phy-for-5.14
> >
> >   - Updates:
> >         - Yaml conversion for renesas,rcar-gen3 pcie phy and
> >         rockchip-usb-phy bindings
> >         - Support for devm_phy_get() taking NULL phy name
> >
> >   - New support:
> >       - PCIe phy for Qualcomm IPQ60xx
> >       - PCIe phy for Qualcomm SDX55
> >       - USB phy for RK3308
> >       - CAN transceivers phy for TI TCAN104x
> >         - Innosilicon-based CSI dphy for rockchip
>
> Why is PHY_MT7621_PCI only y/n?  Shouldn't this be able to be built as a
> module?
>
> The USB phy enables this driver, which now forces me to build it into my
> kernel, which does not seem like a wise idea.  I'm not sure which commit
> in this series does this, but that isn't a good thing.
>
> Ah, it's 6eded551cefe ("phy: ralink: Kconfig: convert mt7621-pci-phy
> into 'bool'"), why is that needed?  We are working to turn more code
> into modules, not force them to be built in, this feels like the wrong
> way to go :(

This was turned into bool to automatically be included if CONFIG_PCI_MT7621
is set. This should be the only requirement to add this phy driver for
real hardware since it has nothing to do if there is no
CONFIG_PCI_MT7621. That's why Kconfig is now:

depends on (RALINK && OF && PCI_MT7621) || COMPILE_TEST
Am I missing something here???

Thanks,
    Sergio Paracuellos

>
> I don't want to take this series because of this at the moment.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h