[PATCH 3/6] phy: renesas: Add RZ/G2L usb phy control driver

[Vinod Koul]

On 11-06-21, 14:46, Biju Das wrote:
> +static int rzg2l_usbphycontrol_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct rzg2l_usbphycontrol_drv *drv;
> +	struct phy_provider *provider;
> +	u32 val;
> +	int n;
> +
> +	if (!dev->of_node) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "device tree not found\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

why do you think this would happen?

> +
> +	drv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drv), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!drv)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	drv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(drv->base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(drv->base);
> +
> +	for (n = 0; n < NUM_PORTS; n++) {
> +		struct rzg2l_phyctrl *phy = &drv->phyctrl[n];
> +
> +		phy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &rzg2l_usbphyctrl_ops);
> +		if (IS_ERR(phy->phy)) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to create USBPHY Control\n");
> +			return PTR_ERR(phy->phy);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (n == 1)
> +			phy->phy_reset_port_mask = PHY_RESET_PORT2;

this looks inverted, should this logically not be:
                if (n == 0)
                        phy->phy_reset_port_mask = PHY_RESET_PORT1;
?

> +		else
> +			phy->phy_reset_port_mask = PHY_RESET_PORT1;
> +
> +		phy->drv = drv;
> +		phy_set_drvdata(phy->phy, phy);
> +	};
> +
> +	provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev,
> +						 rzg2l_usbphycontrol_xlate);

single line pls

-- 
~Vinod