[PATCH] phy: tegra: add missing put_device() call in tegra210_xusb_padctl_probe()
Dmitry Osipenko
digetx at gmail.com
Tue Dec 7 06:37:48 PST 2021
07.12.2021 17:35, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 07.12.2021 15:56, Qing Wang пишет:
>> From: Wang Qing <wangqing at vivo.com>
>>
>> of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the embedded struct device
>> which needs to be dropped when error return.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing at vivo.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c
>> index eedfc7c..05a0800
>> --- a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb-tegra210.c
>> @@ -3170,8 +3170,10 @@ tegra210_xusb_padctl_probe(struct device *dev,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!platform_get_drvdata(pdev))
>> + if (!platform_get_drvdata(pdev)) {
>> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
>> return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>> + }
>>
>> padctl->regmap = dev_get_regmap(&pdev->dev, "usb_sleepwalk");
>> if (!padctl->regmap)
>>
>
> What if dev_get_regmap() fails? What if driver is removed?
>
> Please either fix it properly or don't fix it.
>
My bad, I see now in the code that this dev_get_regmap() fail is okay.
Nevertheless the driver removal is incorrect.
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list