[PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC support to the arasan eMMC driver

[A, Rashmi]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vinod Koul <vkoul at kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 9, 2021 2:12 PM
> To: A, Rashmi <rashmi.a at intel.com>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>; Michal Simek
> <michal.simek at xilinx.com>; linux-mmc <linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org>; Linux
> ARM <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel at vger.kernel.org>; Kishon <kishon at ti.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>; linux-phy at lists.infradead.org; Mark
> Gross <mgross at linux.intel.com>; kris.pan at linux.intel.com; Zhou, Furong
> <furong.zhou at intel.com>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar at intel.com>; Hunter, Adrian
> <adrian.hunter at intel.com>; Vaidya, Mahesh R
> <mahesh.r.vaidya at intel.com>; Srikandan, Nandhini
> <nandhini.srikandan at intel.com>; Demakkanavar, Kenchappa
> <kenchappa.demakkanavar at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC
> support to the arasan eMMC driver
> 
> On 09-08-21, 05:16, A, Rashmi wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > Rashmi, is it safe to apply this separately from the phy driver/dt changes?
> > > Then I can queue this via my mmc tree, if you like.
> > No, the phy driver/dt changes must go together with "mmc: sdhci-of-
> arasan: Add intel Thunder Bay SOC support to the arasan eMMC driver"
> patch.
> 
> Why is that?
> 
> What could happen, emmc driver will complain about phy not found and bail
> right?
This is right, but ideally both mmc:phy and mmc: sdhci-of-arasan driver code changes should go together
> 
> --
> ~Vinod