From hqa02330 at nifty.com  Mon Aug  1 07:58:54 2011
From: hqa02330 at nifty.com (Komuro)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 20:58:54 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Lecture of German
In-Reply-To: <4E357DB3.8060900@lwfinger.net>
References: <4E357DB3.8060900@lwfinger.net>
	<20110724111845.GA4247@isilmar-3.linta.de>	<20110724093732.GA1391@isilmar-3.linta.de>	<10141682.94311295176659812.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>	<11570465.190421279800472391.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>	<20100721124534.GA16130@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1007160519110.14809@lynx>	<13346816.106711279371832699.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>	<8676353.36801311478090251.hqa02330@nifty.com>	<29222015.82611311505691466.hqa02330@nifty.com>
	<23924865.79851312109364991.hqa02330@nifty.com>
Message-ID: <33364359.178961312199934823.hqa02330@nifty.com>

>> In a letter to Max Born, Einstein wrote:
>> "Der Alte nicht w&uuml;rfelt."
>>
>> In English, "He [God] does not throw dice."
>>
>> Does "der Alte" mean God in German?
>>
>> According to the dictionary, Alte means old.
>
>I'm not an expert in German, but I'll try here. The word "alte" is an adjecti
ve 
>meaning old. According to Wikipedia, "der Alte" usually translates as "the ol
d 
>man"; however, when taken in context, Einstein was probably referring to some
 
>kind of supreme being, i.e. God. Note that Einstein himself has been referred
 to 
>as "der Alte".
>
>Larry


Thanks for explanation.


From hqa02330 at nifty.com  Mon Aug  1 08:33:33 2011
From: hqa02330 at nifty.com (Komuro)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 21:33:33 +0900 (JST)
Subject: ide-cs driver
In-Reply-To: <20110724111845.GA4247@isilmar-3.linta.de>
References: <20110724111845.GA4247@isilmar-3.linta.de>
	<20110724093732.GA1391@isilmar-3.linta.de>
	<10141682.94311295176659812.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>
	<11570465.190421279800472391.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>
	<20100721124534.GA16130@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1007160519110.14809@lynx>
	<13346816.106711279371832699.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>
	<8676353.36801311478090251.hqa02330@nifty.com>
	<29222015.82611311505691466.hqa02330@nifty.com>
Message-ID: <12735950.186421312202013074.hqa02330@nifty.com>

Hi,

ide-cs driver is old and un-maintained.
so I think ide-cs should have been removed when Linux becomes ver 3.0.



Best Regards
Komuro



From info at zeek-tech.com  Tue Aug  2 10:43:17 2011
From: info at zeek-tech.com (=?gb2312?B?yM67wMfZ?=)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:43:17 +0800
Subject: =?gb2312?B?NsTasr+/2NbGtePT67/Y1sa8vMfJTkRVWUo=?=
Message-ID: <mailman.51.1312296606.20020.linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org>

wEGBxz08


 .?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.?.


  89109?.?.?.?.?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Lbych9838.xls
Type: application/x-msexcel
Size: 35840 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-pcmcia/attachments/20110802/0a015bb3/attachment.bin>

From hqa02330 at nifty.com  Sat Aug  6 06:13:10 2011
From: hqa02330 at nifty.com (Komuro)
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 19:13:10 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [pcmciautils] hotplug is obsolete?
In-Reply-To: <15956192.95551311509103674.hqa02330@nifty.com>
References: <15956192.95551311509103674.hqa02330@nifty.com>
	<20110724111845.GA4247@isilmar-3.linta.de>
	<20110724093732.GA1391@isilmar-3.linta.de>
	<10141682.94311295176659812.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>
	<11570465.190421279800472391.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>
	<20100721124534.GA16130@comet.dominikbrodowski.net>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1007160519110.14809@lynx>
	<13346816.106711279371832699.komurojun-mbn@nifty.com>
	<8676353.36801311478090251.hqa02330@nifty.com>
	<29222015.82611311505691466.hqa02330@nifty.com>
Message-ID: <26191470.81201312625590734.hqa02330@nifty.com>


Hi,

It seems hotplug is obsolete.

If yes, hotplug-script should be removed from pcmciautils?



Best Regards
Komuro



From dbaryshkov at gmail.com  Sun Aug  7 07:05:31 2011
From: dbaryshkov at gmail.com (Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov)
Date: Sun,  7 Aug 2011 15:05:31 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl: retain ops structure on collie
Message-ID: <1312715131-3956-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>

The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as
a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers.
So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than
in __initdata.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
Cc: stable at kernel.org

diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
@@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
 	sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE
+static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = {
+#else
 static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = {
+#endif
 	.owner                  = THIS_MODULE,
 	.hw_init                = sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_init,
 	.hw_shutdown            = sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_shutdown,
-- 
1.7.2.5



From dbaryshkov at gmail.com  Thu Aug 18 07:46:42 2011
From: dbaryshkov at gmail.com (Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:46:42 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl: retain ops structure on collie
In-Reply-To: <1312715131-3956-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
References: <1312715131-3956-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CALT56yPWBNgPONQfTCtN9rZLTWrXx53m3Dk-xx8XshPNwsrnqQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
<dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as
> a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers.
> So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than
> in __initdata.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
> Cc: stable at kernel.org

Any comments on this patch?

> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
> index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
> ? ? ? ?sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt);
> ?}
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE
> +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = {
> +#else
> ?static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = {
> +#endif
> ? ? ? ?.owner ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?= THIS_MODULE,
> ? ? ? ?.hw_init ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?= sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_init,
> ? ? ? ?.hw_shutdown ? ? ? ? ? ?= sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_shutdown,
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
>



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry


From eric.y.miao at gmail.com  Thu Aug 18 22:19:33 2011
From: eric.y.miao at gmail.com (Eric Miao)
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:19:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl: retain ops structure on collie
In-Reply-To: <CALT56yPWBNgPONQfTCtN9rZLTWrXx53m3Dk-xx8XshPNwsrnqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1312715131-3956-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
	<CALT56yPWBNgPONQfTCtN9rZLTWrXx53m3Dk-xx8XshPNwsrnqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAMPhdO-80Zd3uxTe8U-EKMooQUd6iucq05bxp2puMRrCtCbwVw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
<dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> <dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as
>> a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers.
>> So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than
>> in __initdata.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
>> Cc: stable at kernel.org
>
> Any comments on this patch?
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
>> index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
>> @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
>> ? ? ? ?sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt);
>> ?}
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE
>> +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = {
>> +#else
>> ?static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = {
>> +#endif

Looks OK, and maybe we can put it even simpler by just removing __initdata.

>> ? ? ? ?.owner ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?= THIS_MODULE,
>> ? ? ? ?.hw_init ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?= sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_init,
>> ? ? ? ?.hw_shutdown ? ? ? ? ? ?= sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_shutdown,
>> --
>> 1.7.2.5
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
>


From pavel at ucw.cz  Fri Aug 26 16:34:02 2011
From: pavel at ucw.cz (Pavel Machek)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:34:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl: retain ops structure on collie
In-Reply-To: <CAMPhdO-80Zd3uxTe8U-EKMooQUd6iucq05bxp2puMRrCtCbwVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1312715131-3956-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
	<CALT56yPWBNgPONQfTCtN9rZLTWrXx53m3Dk-xx8XshPNwsrnqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMPhdO-80Zd3uxTe8U-EKMooQUd6iucq05bxp2puMRrCtCbwVw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110826203402.GB6697@ucw.cz>

On Fri 2011-08-19 10:19:33, Eric Miao wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> <dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
> > <dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as
> >> a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers.
> >> So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than
> >> in __initdata.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
> >> Cc: stable at kernel.org
> >
> > Any comments on this patch?
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
> >> index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
> >> @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
> >> ? ? ? ?sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt);
> >> ?}
> >>
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE
> >> +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = {
> >> +#else
> >> ?static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = {
> >> +#endif
> 
> Looks OK, and maybe we can put it even simpler by just removing __initdata.

I'd say so; ifdef to have  initdata there is just too ugly. But I
don't think it is stable material...
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


From dbaryshkov at gmail.com  Fri Aug 26 16:44:28 2011
From: dbaryshkov at gmail.com (Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov)
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 00:44:28 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl: retain ops structure on collie
In-Reply-To: <20110826203402.GB6697@ucw.cz>
References: <1312715131-3956-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
	<CALT56yPWBNgPONQfTCtN9rZLTWrXx53m3Dk-xx8XshPNwsrnqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMPhdO-80Zd3uxTe8U-EKMooQUd6iucq05bxp2puMRrCtCbwVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110826203402.GB6697@ucw.cz>
Message-ID: <CALT56yMrP8e0oBrLq_8CdJQXgm8O3UWv+KXDU6ScRXaEcsX+iw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On 8/27/11, Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote:
> On Fri 2011-08-19 10:19:33, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> <dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> > <dbaryshkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as
>> >> a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers.
>> >> So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than
>> >> in __initdata.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
>> >> Cc: stable at kernel.org
>> >
>> > Any comments on this patch?
>> >
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
>> >> b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
>> >> index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c
>> >> @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct
>> >> soc_pcmcia_socket *skt)
>> >>        sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt);
>> >>  }
>> >>
>> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE
>> >> +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = {
>> >> +#else
>> >>  static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = {
>> >> +#endif
>>
>> Looks OK, and maybe we can put it even simpler by just removing
>> __initdata.
>
> I'd say so; ifdef to have  initdata there is just too ugly. But I
> don't think it is stable material...

Maybe... And memory lost on PXA will be minimal.
It's stable material in the sense that lack of this patch causes
kernel panics.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry


From bjhdtd at sohu.net  Sun Aug 28 06:58:15 2011
From: bjhdtd at sohu.net (nkzvgmx)
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:58:15 +0800
Subject: =?utf-8?B?RFpRUu+8hueUteejgeWFvOWuueiuvuiuoe+8huS4juaVtOaUueWvueetlu+8hg==?=
Message-ID: <9BC8A632297F0C372221C7388151F5FE@ccxedfr>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-pcmcia/attachments/20110828/13c07d6f/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ????????????????????.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 43520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-pcmcia/attachments/20110828/13c07d6f/attachment-0001.doc>

