[PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

[Komuro]

Hi,

>	http://userweb.kernel.org/~brodo/pcmcia-2.6.35.diff

Serial part of Xircom card works with pcmcia-2.6.35.diff.


----- Original Message -----
>Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:32:12 +0200
>From: Dominik Brodowski <linux at dominikbrodowski.net>
>To: Komuro <komurojun-mbn at nifty.com>, pavel at ucw.cz
>Cc: linux-pcmcia at lists.infradead.org
>Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not
>	use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()
>
>
>Hey,
>
>On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:50:31PM +0900, Komuro wrote:
>> >Also on re-inserting the card (with 2.6.36-rc4+ as of today)?
>> 
>> I tried the 2.6.36-rc4-git4.
>
>Thanks for testing!
>
>> >elese we wouldn't see the "is a 16550A" message, right?
>> 
>> Even if the COR(Configuration Option Register) of irq is not properly setup
,
>> we can see the above message...
>
>Nothing relating to setting CISREG_COR (at least on pcnet_cs) changed, and
>serial_cs does not modify CISREG_COR on such pseudo-multifunction devices.
>
>Would it be possible for you to re-check plain 2.6.35 and 2.6.35 with the
>pcmcia patchset availble at 
>	http://userweb.kernel.org/~brodo/pcmcia-2.6.35.diff
>?
>
>If this works, we know that it's a serial/tty core issue, else it's indeed a
>PCMCIA issue.
>
>Pavel: has the bt / pcmcia issue you were seeing with -rc1 been solved? If
>not, could you try out 2.6.35 with this bigdiff as well, please?
>
>Thanks & best,
>	Dominik