PATCH - update pata_pcmcia/ide-cs with transcend and kingston cards

Kristoffer Ericson kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com
Wed Apr 21 11:40:01 EDT 2010


On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:26:54 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff at garzik.org> wrote:

> On 04/20/2010 01:33 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > Jeff,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:29:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> On 04/20/2010 01:23 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 07:54:11PM +0200, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> >>>> This patch adds idstrings for Kingston 1GB/4GB and Transcend 4GB/8GB.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Ericson<kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> Applied to the PCMCIA urgent tree -- Bartlomiej, David and Jeff, do you
> >>> agree this is pused upstream through PCMCIA?
> >>
> >> PCI ID additions are normally pushed through the relevant subsystem tree
> >> and not the PCI tree, so I do not understand why PCMCIA must be
> >> different.
> >>
> >> But, it is a simple change and no big deal to push via PCMCIA tree.
> >
> > Actually, I do not care either way -- so it isn't a "must" at all... So if
> > you prefer to pick it up, I'm all fine with it. Just let me know how you
> > prefer :)
> 
> 
> I would tend to prefer that ID patches go through the libata/IDE 
> subsystem trees, to be similar to PCI and other bus ID patches.

Goodie, then I know where to drop the patches in the future. Thanks
for clearing that up.

> 
> But it is such a small matter that, if you have already applied the 
> patch to your tree, I would rather not waste your time removing the patch!
> 
> If you have not yet applied it, though, I can merge it into my tree.
> 
> 	Jeff
> 
> 


-- 
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson at gmail.com>



More information about the linux-pcmcia mailing list