[PATCH -next] pcmcia: fix controller printk warnings
Randy Dunlap
randy.dunlap at oracle.com
Fri Sep 18 18:16:56 EDT 2009
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:34:03 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:14:23 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > Subject: [PATCH -next] pcmcia: fix controller printk warnings
>
> Why the "-next"?
>
> >
> > drivers/pcmcia/i82365.c:1055: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'phys_addr_t'
> > drivers/pcmcia/i82365.c:1055: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'phys_addr_t'
> > drivers/pcmcia/tcic.c:734: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'phys_addr_t'
> > drivers/pcmcia/tcic.c:734: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'phys_addr_t'
>
> afacit this patch is needed in mainline also, but the "-next" indicates
> that it's only needed in linux-next. This sends me scrabbling around
> trying to work out why the "-next" was added.
That's where I encountered the warnings.
---
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/
More information about the linux-pcmcia
mailing list