[PATCH -next] pcmcia: fix controller printk warnings

Randy Dunlap randy.dunlap at oracle.com
Fri Sep 18 18:16:56 EDT 2009


On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:34:03 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:14:23 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH -next] pcmcia: fix controller printk warnings
> 
> Why the "-next"?
> 
> > 
> > drivers/pcmcia/i82365.c:1055: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'phys_addr_t'
> > drivers/pcmcia/i82365.c:1055: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'phys_addr_t'
> > drivers/pcmcia/tcic.c:734: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'phys_addr_t'
> > drivers/pcmcia/tcic.c:734: warning: format '%#x' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'phys_addr_t'
> 
> afacit this patch is needed in mainline also, but the "-next" indicates
> that it's only needed in linux-next.  This sends me scrabbling around
> trying to work out why the "-next" was added.

That's where I encountered the warnings.


---
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/



More information about the linux-pcmcia mailing list