[Bug 2944] Cardbus cards not seen on ti1620 cardbus controler

[bugme-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org]

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2944





------- Additional Comments From anonymous at kernel-bugs.osdl.org  2006-05-08 13:05 -------
Reply-To: aaron at assonance.org

I have a laptop with:
02:00.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1410 PC card Cardbus
Controller (rev 02)

That also seems fixed by this patch (pci=assign-buses also worked
around the problem).

It's in a Clevo D900T laptop which is rebadged and sold all over the place.

Aaron Cohen

On 5/8/06, bugme-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org
<bugme-daemon at bugzilla.kernel.org> wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2944
>
> bk at suse.de changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Attachment #7807 is|0                           |1
>            obsolete|                            |
> Attachment #7850 is|0                           |1
>            obsolete|                            |
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From bk at suse.de  2006-05-08 09:49 -------
> Created an attachment (id=8058)
 --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=8058&action=view)
>  --> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=8058&action=view)
> final patch, the functional equivalent of the last patch, with comment updates
> and a superflous early initialisation removed
>
> This is the final patch which is (in the same functional form)
> in the pcmcia-2.6 git tree of Dominik since soon (this version
> has only cosmetical changes) since 4 weeks and since 3 weeks in
> the -mm kernels
>
> Since every tester reported success and there were no failure reports
> so far, I'd regard it as stable and I think it should be merged to mainline
> at the next opportunity.
>
> Dominik, can you update the patch in your pcmcia git tree to this version
> just to ensure that Linus does not grab the unpolished version from your tree?
> (e.g. it names itself also pci_fixup_parent_subordinate() in the function
> header, while it should read yenta_fixup_parent_subordinate(), just an example)
>
> Thanks,
> Bernhard
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
>



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.