[PATCH 0/9] Deliver TLS session tags to upper-layer consumers (NFSD)
Jeff Layton
jlayton at kernel.org
Sat Jun 6 06:26:10 PDT 2026
On Fri, 2026-06-05 at 13:34 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> NFSD and similar upper-layer services want access-control decisions
> based on TLS peer-certificate characteristics, but in-kernel x.509
> parsing would duplicate work mature userspace libraries already do.
> This series gives tlshd a way to evaluate certificates against
> admin-defined policy and report matching policies back to the kernel
> as opaque string tags. The handshake layer plumbs the tags through to
> the upper-layer consumer's completion callback; intersection against
> per-resource tag sets stays the consumer's problem.
>
> Four architectural choices shape the series, only one of which is
> visible in any single patch.
>
> The tagging vocabulary is opaque to the kernel. tlshd decides what
> each tag means; the handshake layer and its consumers only test
> membership. This keeps x.509 out of the kernel and lets policy evolve
> at userspace speed. Any future attribute the kernel wants to gate on
> must be expressed as a tag rather than as a new netlink field per
> attribute.
>
> DONE gains a privilege check (patch 1) as a prerequisite, not as
> cleanup. Without it, an unprivileged process guessing a sockfd could
> submit a forged DONE and effectively grant or deny tag membership
> for a real handshake. Once tags carry authorization weight, that
> pre-existing gap becomes load-bearing. The fix predates tags in
> principle and carries a Fixes: tag, but it sits at the head of this
> series so the rest of the work has a trustworthy foundation.
>
> HANDSHAKE_MAX_SESSIONTAGS is advertised on every ACCEPT reply as
> HANDSHAKE_A_ACCEPT_MAX_TAGS (patch 6), so tlshd can size its
> DONE-side tag list against the kernel's runtime limit rather than
> guessing from header constants. If a daemon overruns anyway, the
> DONE handler truncates and logs one pr_warn_once rather than
> returning -E2BIG: tearing down a handshake the operator almost
> certainly wants to keep is a worse outcome than dropping a few
> tags. The truncation path is defense-in-depth for a buggy or
> stale agent, not the primary signal.
>
> The tagset helper (patch 3) is split out as a generic library so
> NFSD export tagging (patches 8 and 9) can use it without further
> churn in net/handshake/.
>
> ---
> Chuck Lever (9):
> handshake: Require admin permission for DONE command
> handshake: Add tags to "done" downcall
> lib: Add a "tagset" data structure
> handshake: Pick up session tags passed during the DONE downcall
> handshake: Add a kunit test for the completion gate
> handshake: advertise the session-tag cap to user space
> SUNRPC: Copy the TLS session tags when they are available
> NFSD: Implement export tagging
> NFSD: Add allow_tags to the netlink export interface
>
> Documentation/core-api/index.rst | 1 +
> Documentation/core-api/tagset.rst | 225 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Documentation/netlink/specs/handshake.yaml | 16 ++
> Documentation/netlink/specs/nfsd.yaml | 10 ++
> Documentation/networking/tls-handshake.rst | 63 +++++++-
> drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 3 +-
> drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c | 3 +-
> fs/nfsd/export.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++-
> fs/nfsd/export.h | 11 ++
> fs/nfsd/netlink.c | 4 +-
> fs/nfsd/netlink.h | 3 +-
> fs/nfsd/trace.h | 19 +++
> include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h | 2 +
> include/linux/tagset.h | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/net/handshake.h | 30 +++-
> include/uapi/linux/handshake.h | 4 +
> include/uapi/linux/nfsd_netlink.h | 1 +
> lib/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/tagset.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/handshake/genl.c | 7 +-
> net/handshake/handshake-test.c | 72 +++++++++
> net/handshake/handshake.h | 6 +
> net/handshake/netlink.c | 109 +++++++++++++-
> net/handshake/request.c | 68 ++++++++-
> net/handshake/tlshd.c | 10 +-
> net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 11 +-
> net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c | 12 ++
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 38 ++++-
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 5 +-
> 29 files changed, 1205 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 4d4d6605de5f91a40335729b6a7cc15e83b280f3
> change-id: 20260512-tls-session-tags-9d0042583f44
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Chuck Lever <chuck.lever at oracle.com>
I was wanting to review this, but I can't seem to get it to apply
cleanly to any known tree. What tree is this based on?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton at kernel.org>
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list