[LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Block storage copy offloading
Bart Van Assche
bvanassche at acm.org
Mon Jan 26 11:12:52 PST 2026
On 1/26/26 10:18 AM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> I am not completely sure that copy offloading to the storage device can
> reduce energy consumption. The storage device needs to spend energy for
> executing this operation, anyway. Do you have any numbers that can
> prove your point?
Yes, we have measurements that prove this point but unfortunately the
vendor that collected this data does not allow us to publish that data.
Reducing energy consumption matters for mobile devices. There are other
applications for copy offloading, e.g. in data centers and in enterprise
applications. I don't think that these other users care as much about
reducing energy consumption as we do.
> Which file system have you considered as working model of your approach?
Every LFS for zoned storage has to perform garbage collection, isn't it?
I think that we can discuss copy offloading without having to discuss
filesystem implementation details.
Thanks,
Bart.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list