[PATCH 2/2] nvme: blk_rq_dma_map_iter_next is no longer using iova state

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 07:58:22PM +0530, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
>> Hu... Why is this not squashed with the previous patch ? If only patch 1 is
>> applied, this will not compile, right ?
>>
> I couldn’t decide whether to use the layering convention or a unified patch,
> so I chose one patch per layer.
> Agreed, independently this doesn't compile, merging make sense.
> I will resend.

Rule number one is: don't break compilation after each step.
Everything else is secondary.

Also I'm only seeing patch 2 anyway, and not patch 1.