[PATCH v4] nvme: reduce firmware activation poll interval
Keith Busch
kbusch at kernel.org
Tue Aug 11 09:08:58 PDT 2026
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 08:17:35PM +0800, guzebing wrote:
> +static int nvme_wait_csts(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u32 mask, u32 val,
> + unsigned long timeout, bool exit_if_ctrl_disabled,
> + u32 *csts)
> {
> - unsigned long timeout_jiffies = jiffies + timeout * HZ;
> - u32 csts;
> int ret;
>
> - while ((ret = ctrl->ops->reg_read32(ctrl, NVME_REG_CSTS, &csts)) == 0) {
> - if (csts == ~0)
> + while ((ret = ctrl->ops->reg_read32(ctrl, NVME_REG_CSTS, csts)) == 0) {
> + if (*csts == ~0)
> return -ENODEV;
> - if ((csts & mask) == val)
> - break;
> + if (exit_if_ctrl_disabled &&
> + !(ctrl->ctrl_config & NVME_CC_ENABLE))
> + return 0;
> + if ((*csts & mask) == val)
> + return 0;
>
> usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> return -EINTR;
> - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout_jiffies)) {
> - dev_err(ctrl->device,
> - "Device not ready; aborting %s, CSTS=0x%x\n",
> - op, csts);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> + if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
Mostly looks fine, though I was hoping to converge a little more
commonality among these functions. I folded some minor changes in when
applying, so please have a look at the current git tree to see if the
result is okay.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list