[PATCH v4] nvme: reduce firmware activation poll interval

Keith Busch kbusch at kernel.org
Tue Aug 11 09:08:58 PDT 2026


On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 08:17:35PM +0800, guzebing wrote:
> +static int nvme_wait_csts(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u32 mask, u32 val,
> +			  unsigned long timeout, bool exit_if_ctrl_disabled,
> +			  u32 *csts)
>  {
> -	unsigned long timeout_jiffies = jiffies + timeout * HZ;
> -	u32 csts;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	while ((ret = ctrl->ops->reg_read32(ctrl, NVME_REG_CSTS, &csts)) == 0) {
> -		if (csts == ~0)
> +	while ((ret = ctrl->ops->reg_read32(ctrl, NVME_REG_CSTS, csts)) == 0) {
> +		if (*csts == ~0)
>  			return -ENODEV;
> -		if ((csts & mask) == val)
> -			break;
> +		if (exit_if_ctrl_disabled &&
> +		    !(ctrl->ctrl_config & NVME_CC_ENABLE))
> +			return 0;
> +		if ((*csts & mask) == val)
> +			return 0;
>  
>  		usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>  		if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
>  			return -EINTR;
> -		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout_jiffies)) {
> -			dev_err(ctrl->device,
> -				"Device not ready; aborting %s, CSTS=0x%x\n",
> -				op, csts);
> -			return -ENODEV;
> -		}
> +		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> +			return -ETIMEDOUT;

Mostly looks fine, though I was hoping to converge a little more
commonality among these functions. I folded some minor changes in when
applying, so please have a look at the current git tree to see if the
result is okay.



More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list