[PATCH blktests] nvme/068: add a test for multipath delayed removal
Nilay Shroff
nilay at linux.ibm.com
Thu Apr 16 04:18:52 PDT 2026
> diff --git a/tests/nvme/068 b/tests/nvme/068
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e06fd6b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/nvme/068
> @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
> +#!/bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0+
> +# Copyright (C) 2026 John Garry
> +#
> +# Test NVMe multipath delayed removal works as expected
> +
Should we also reference the commit 62188639ec16 ("nvme-multipath:
introduce delayed removal of the multipath head node") which introduced
this feature in the kernel?
> +. tests/nvme/rc
> +. common/xfs
> +
> +DESCRIPTION="NVMe multipath delayed removal test"
> +QUICK=1
> +
> +requires() {
> + _nvme_requires
> + _have_loop
> + _have_module_param_value nvme_core multipath Y
> + _require_nvme_trtype_is_fabrics
> +}
> +
> +set_conditions() {
> + _set_nvme_trtype "$@"
> +}
> +
> +_delayed_nvme_reconnect_ctrl() {
> + sleep 5
> + _nvme_connect_subsys
> +}
> +
> +test() {
> + echo "Running ${TEST_NAME}"
> +
> + _setup_nvmet
> +
> + local nvmedev
> + local ns
> + local bytes_written
> + local refcnt_orig
> + local refcnt
> + _nvmet_target_setup
> +
> + _nvme_connect_subsys
> +
> + # Part a: Prove that writes fail when no path returns. Any reads or
> + # writes are queued during the delayed removal period. If no
> + # paths return before the timer expires, then those IOs should
> + # fail.
> + # During the delayed removal period, ensure that the module
> + # refcnt is incremented, to prove that we cannot remove the
> + # driver during this period.
> + nvmedev=$(_find_nvme_dev "${def_subsysnqn}")
> + ns=$(_find_nvme_ns "${def_subsys_uuid}")
> + refcnt=$(_module_use_count nvme_core)
Should the refcount be stored in $refcnt_orig instead of $refcnt?
> + echo 10 > "/sys/block/"$ns"/delayed_removal_secs"
> + refcnt_orig=$(_module_use_count nvme_core)
We may not need to again store refcnt here if we store it
before enabling delayed_removal_sec above.
Other than above trivial comments, this looks good to me.
Thanks,
--Nilay
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list