[PATCH v3 3/3] nvme: handle connectivity loss in nvme_set_queue_count

[Sagi Grimberg]

On 07/01/2025 16:40, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 12:35:23PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> On 17/12/2024 10:35, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 12:10:33PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>>> +	/*
>>>>> +	 * It's either a kernel error or the host observed a connection
>>>>> +	 * lost. In either case it's not possible communicate with the
>>>>> +	 * controller and thus enter the error code path.
>>>>> +	 */
>>>>> +	if (status < 0 || status == NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR)
>>>>>     		return status;
>>>>>     	/*
>>>>>
>>>> Hmm. Maybe checking for NVME_SC_DNR, too?
>>> if no one complains I'll update the check to:
>>>
>>> 	if (status < 0 || (status > 0 && (status & NVME_STATUS_DNR)) ||
>>> 	    status == NVME_SC_HOST_PATH_ERROR)
>>> 		return status;
>>>
>>> okay?
>> Why do we care about the DNR? are you going to retry based on it?
> I don't know if we should care. Hannes brought this up.

I don't see why should we care.