[RFC PATCH 03/14] nvmet: Implement CCR nvme command

[Mohamed Khalfella]

On Sat 2025-12-27 11:39:55 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> >>> +void nvmet_execute_cross_ctrl_reset(struct nvmet_req *req)
> >>> +{
> >>> +	struct nvmet_ctrl *ictrl, *ctrl = req->sq->ctrl;
> >>> +	struct nvme_command *cmd = req->cmd;
> >>> +	struct nvmet_ccr *ccr, *new_ccr;
> >>> +	int ccr_active, ccr_total;
> >>> +	u16 cntlid, status = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +	cntlid = le16_to_cpu(cmd->ccr.icid);
> >>> +	if (ctrl->cntlid == cntlid) {
> >>> +		req->error_loc =
> >>> +			offsetof(struct nvme_cross_ctrl_reset_cmd, icid);
> >>> +		status = NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD | NVME_STATUS_DNR;
> >>> +		goto out;
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	ictrl = nvmet_ctrl_find_get_ccr(ctrl->subsys, ctrl->hostnqn,
> >> What does the 'i' stand for?
> > 'i' stands for impacted controller. Also, if you see sctrl the 's'
> > stands for source controller. These terms are from TP8028.
> 
> Can you perhaps add a comment on this?

Okay, will do that.

> 
> >>> +	new_ccr->ciu = cmd->ccr.ciu;
> >>> +	new_ccr->icid = cntlid;
> >>> +	new_ccr->ctrl = ictrl;
> >>> +	list_add_tail(&new_ccr->entry, &ctrl->ccrs);
> >>> +	mutex_unlock(&ctrl->lock);
> >>> +
> >>> +	nvmet_ctrl_fatal_error(ictrl);
> >> Don't you need to wait for it to complete?
> >> e.g. flush_work(&ictrl->fatal_err_work);
> >>
> >> Or is that done async? will need to look downstream...
> > No, we do not need to wait for ictrl->fatal_err_work to complete. An AEN
> > will be sent when ictrl exits. It is okay if AEN is sent before CCR
> > request is completed. The initiator should expect this behavior and deal
> > with it.
> 
> Yes, saw that in a later patch (didn't get to do a full review yet)