[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Suppress a class of lockdep complaints

[Sagi Grimberg]

>> Can we fix the lockdep not to get confused
> 
> Lockdep uses static keys by default. Associating a single static key 
> with multiple synchronization object instances can cause false 
> positives. This is why I introduced support for dynamic keys in lockdep 
> about four years ago. I don't think that it is possible to make dynamic 
> keys the default without changing all synchronization primitives.
> 
>> or ignore it if its not a real issue ?
> 
> Most lockdep reports indicate a real problem so every lockdep report 
> should be reviewed. Having to review false positive complaints every 
> time blocktests is run is tedious. I think it is much better to suppress 
> false positive complaints (in a safe way) rather than asking everyone 
> who runs blktests to review all false positive lockdep complaints every 
> time blktests is run.

Agree, shutting up just this complaint would be great. This looks
perfectly fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>