[PATCH 2/2] nvme: use blk-mq polling for uring commands

[Keith Busch]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 02:16:18PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 08:52:53AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > +	else if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_IOPOLL)
> > > > +		ioucmd->flags |= IORING_URING_CMD_NOPOLL;
> > > 
> > > If IO_URING_F_IOPOLL would have come here as part of "ioucmd->flags", we
> > > could have just cleared that here. That would avoid the need of NOPOLL flag.
> > > That said, I don't feel strongly about new flag too. You decide.
> > 
> > IO_URING_F_IOPOLL, while named in an enum that sounds suspiciouly like it is
> > part of ioucmd->flags, is actually ctx flags, so a little confusing. And we
> > need to be a litle careful here: the existing ioucmd->flags is used with uapi
> > flags.
> 
> Indeed. If this is getting crufty, series can just enable polling on
> no-payload requests. Reducing nvme handlers - for another day.

Well something needs to be done about multipath since it's broken today: if the
path changes between submission and poll, we'll consult the wrong queue for
polling enabled. This could cause a missed polling opprotunity, polling a
pointer that isn't a bio, or poll an irq enabled cq. All are bad.