[PATCH 4/5] net/tls: split tls_rx_reader_lock

Hannes Reinecke hare at suse.de
Mon Jul 3 03:21:32 PDT 2023


On 7/3/23 12:06, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/3/23 12:04, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> Split tls_rx_reader_{lock,unlock} into an 'acquire/release' and
>> the actual locking part.
>> With that we can use the tls_rx_reader_lock in situations where
>> the socket is already locked.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de>
>> ---
>>   net/tls/tls_sw.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
>> index 9aef45e870a5..d0636ea13009 100644
>> --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
>> +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
>> @@ -1848,13 +1848,10 @@ tls_read_flush_backlog(struct sock *sk, struct 
>> tls_prot_info *prot,
>>       return sk_flush_backlog(sk);
>>   }
>> -static int tls_rx_reader_lock(struct sock *sk, struct 
>> tls_sw_context_rx *ctx,
>> -                  bool nonblock)
>> +static int tls_rx_reader_acquire(struct sock *sk, struct 
>> tls_sw_context_rx *ctx,
>> +                 bool nonblock)
> 
> Nit: I still think tls_rx_reader_enter/tls_rx_reader_exit are more
> appropriate names.

I don't mind either way, but I've interpreted the comments from Jakub 
that he'd like this naming better.

Jakub?

Cheers,

Hannes




More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list