[PATCHv5 0/4] block integrity: directly map user space addresses

[Jens Axboe]

On 12/1/23 3:49 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:42:53AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 04:13:45PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
>>> On 12/1/2023 3:23 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>> From: Keith Busch<kbusch at kernel.org>
>>>
>>> This causes a regression (existed in previous version too).
>>> System freeze on issuing single read/write io that used to work fine 
>>> earlier:
>>> fio -iodepth=1 -rw=randread -ioengine=io_uring_cmd -cmd_type=nvme 
>>> -bs=4096 -numjobs=1 -size=4096 -filename=/dev/ng0n1 -md_per_io_size=8 
>>> -name=pt
>>>
>>> This is because we pin one bvec during submission, but unpin 4 on 
>>> completion. bio_integrity_unpin_bvec() uses bip->bip_max_vcnt, which is 
>>> set to 4 (equal to BIO_INLINE_VECS) in this case.
>>>
>>> To use bip_max_vcnt the way this series uses, we need below patch/fix:
>>
>> Thanks for the catch! Earlier versions of this series was capped by the
>> byte count rather than the max_vcnt value, so the inline condition
>> didn't matter before. I think your update looks good. I'll double check
>> what's going on with my custom tests to see why it didn't see this
>> problem.
> 
> Got it: I was using ioctl instead of iouring. ioctl doesn't set
> REQ_ALLOC_CACHE, so we don't get a bio_set in bio_integrity_alloc(), and
> that makes inline_vecs set similiar to what your diff does.
> 
> Jens already applied the latest series for the next merge. We can append
> this or fold atop, or back it out and we can rework it for another
> version. No rush; for your patch:

I folded this into the original to avoid the breakage, even if it wasn't
a huge concern for this particular issue. But it's close enough to
merging, figured we may as well do that rather than have a fixup patch.

Please check the end result, both for-next and for-6.8/block are updated
now.

-- 
Jens Axboe