[PATCH 4/6] block: propagate BLKROSET on the whole device to all partitions
Hannes Reinecke
hare at suse.de
Sun Jan 10 10:00:48 EST 2021
On 1/9/21 11:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Change the policy so that a BLKROSET on the whole device also affects
> partitions. To quote Martin K. Petersen:
>
> It's very common for database folks to twiddle the read-only state of
> block devices and partitions. I know that our users will find it very
> counter-intuitive that setting /dev/sda read-only won't prevent writes
> to /dev/sda1.
>
> The existing behavior is inconsistent in the sense that doing:
>
> # blockdev --setro /dev/sda
> # echo foo > /dev/sda1
>
> permits writes. But:
>
> # blockdev --setro /dev/sda
> <something triggers revalidate>
> # echo foo > /dev/sda1
>
> doesn't.
>
> And a subsequent:
>
> # blockdev --setrw /dev/sda
> # echo foo > /dev/sda1
>
> doesn't work either since sda1's read-only policy has been inherited
> from the whole-disk device.
>
> You need to do:
>
> # blockdev --rereadpt
>
> after setting the whole-disk device rw to effectuate the same change on
> the partitions, otherwise they are stuck being read-only indefinitely.
>
> However, setting the read-only policy on a partition does *not* require
> the revalidate step. As a matter of fact, doing the revalidate will blow
> away the policy setting you just made.
>
> So the user needs to take different actions depending on whether they
> are trying to read-protect a whole-disk device or a partition. Despite
> using the same ioctl. That is really confusing.
>
> I have lost count how many times our customers have had data clobbered
> because of ambiguity of the existing whole-disk device policy. The
> current behavior violates the principle of least surprise by letting the
> user think they write protected the whole disk when they actually
> didn't.
>
> Suggested-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen at oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen at oracle.com>
> ---
> block/genhd.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.de>
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare at suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list