[PATCH] nvme: use lighter smp barriers in nvme_irq
Keith Busch
kbusch at kernel.org
Thu Feb 18 16:57:58 EST 2021
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 04:06:35AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 2/17/21 19:28, Keith Busch wrote:
> > The variables the driver was protecting no longer exist, so I also agree
> > the barriers should not be necessary.
> >
>
> Are you saying something like following is needed ?
Right, I'm just saying the barriers don't appear to be necessary, so
they can go away as you've indicated below.
> From a3a73bd3943b479f82ff00582baf2c37c1afd8e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni at wdc.com>
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:01:37 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] nvme-pci: remove the barriers
>
> The variable which was protected by the barriers is removed in
> The commit f6c4d97b0d82 (" nvme/pci: Remove last_cq_head").
>
> Remove the barriers which was protecting the variable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni at wdc.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 0045c5edf629..3729775f6a8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -1062,14 +1062,8 @@ static irqreturn_t nvme_irq(int irq, void *data)
> struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = data;
> irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
>
> - /*
> - * The rmb/wmb pair ensures we see all updates from a previous run of
> - * the irq handler, even if that was on another CPU.
> - */
> - rmb();
> if (nvme_process_cq(nvmeq))
> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> - wmb();
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.22.1
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list