[PATCH net-next RFC v1 06/10] nvme-tcp: Add DDP data-path

Boris Pismenny borispismenny at gmail.com
Sun Nov 8 08:59:01 EST 2020



On 09/10/2020 2:00, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>   static
>>>   int nvme_tcp_offload_socket(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue,
>>>                   struct nvme_tcp_config *config)
>>> @@ -630,6 +720,7 @@ static void nvme_tcp_error_recovery(struct 
>>> nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
>>>   static int nvme_tcp_process_nvme_cqe(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue,
>>>           struct nvme_completion *cqe)
>>>   {
>>> +    struct nvme_tcp_request *req;
>>>       struct request *rq;
>>>       rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(nvme_tcp_tagset(queue), cqe->command_id);
>>> @@ -641,8 +732,15 @@ static int nvme_tcp_process_nvme_cqe(struct 
>>> nvme_tcp_queue *queue,
>>>           return -EINVAL;
>>>       }
>>> -    if (!nvme_try_complete_req(rq, cqe->status, cqe->result))
>>> -        nvme_complete_rq(rq);
>>> +    req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
>>> +    if (req->offloaded) {
>>> +        req->status = cqe->status;
>>> +        req->result = cqe->result;
>>> +        nvme_tcp_teardown_ddp(queue, cqe->command_id, rq);
>>> +    } else {
>>> +        if (!nvme_try_complete_req(rq, cqe->status, cqe->result))
>>> +            nvme_complete_rq(rq);
>>> +    }
> Oh forgot to ask,
>
> We have places in the driver that we may complete (cancel) one
> or more requests from the error recovery or timeout flow. We
> first prevent future incoming RX on the socket such that we
> can safely cancel requests. This may break with the deferred
> completion in ddp_teardown_done.
>
> If I have a request that is waiting for ddp_teardown_done do
> I have a way to tell the HW to never call ddp_teardown_done
> on a specific socket?
>
> If so the place to is in nvme_tcp_stop_queue.
Interesting and indeed, it is a problem that we haven't considered.




More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list