[PATCH 3/3] nvme-rdma: assign completion vector correctly

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:44:06AM +0300, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>> I don't think 1+2 are 5.8 material, so please just resend 3 standalone
>> for now, and then resend 1+2 once I've merged it and rebased nvme-5.9
>> on top of nvme-5.8.
>
> Ok. Actually 1+2 were aimed to be merged to 5.8 but created a conflict 
> between Jason's and Jens's trees.
>
> If we go this way it means we can't push new features to RDMA and use it in 
> NVMf in the same cycle.
>
> Jason,
>
> can we push iSER CQ sharing to kernel-5.8 ?

We're not going to merge new features in nvme after -rc2.  For cross
subsystem coordination either everything needs to go in through one
tree if possible, or we'll need shared branches.