[PATCH] nvmet-fc: Fix a missed _irqsave version of spin_lock in 'nvmet_fc_fod_op_done()'
Sagi Grimberg
sagi at grimberg.me
Mon Aug 24 16:00:11 EDT 2020
> The way 'spin_lock()' and 'spin_lock_irqsave()' are used is not consistent
> in this function.
>
> Use 'spin_lock_irqsave()' also here, as there is no guarantee that
> interruptions are disabled at that point, according to surrounding code.
>
> Fixes: a97ec51b37ef ("nvmet_fc: Rework target side abort handling")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> Not tested, only based on what looks logical to me according to
> surrounding code
> ---
> drivers/nvme/target/fc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
> index 55bafd56166a..e6861cc10e7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
> @@ -2342,9 +2342,9 @@ nvmet_fc_fod_op_done(struct nvmet_fc_fcp_iod *fod)
> return;
> if (fcpreq->fcp_error ||
> fcpreq->transferred_length != fcpreq->transfer_length) {
> - spin_lock(&fod->flock);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fod->flock, flags);
> fod->abort = true;
> - spin_unlock(&fod->flock);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fod->flock, flags);
>
> nvmet_req_complete(&fod->req, NVME_SC_INTERNAL);
> return;
>
James, can I get a reviewed-by from you on this?
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list