[LSF/MM TOPIC] KPTI effect on IO performance

Ming Lei ming.lei at redhat.com
Wed Jan 31 18:35:21 PST 2018


Hi Scotty,

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:43:33AM -0700, Scotty Bauer wrote:
> On 2018-01-31 01:23, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > After KPTI is merged, there is extra load introduced to context switch
> > between user space and kernel space. It is observed on my laptop that
> > one
> > syscall takes extra ~0.15us[1] compared with 'nopti'.
> > 
> > IO performance is affected too, it is observed that IOPS drops by 32% in
> > my test[2] on null_blk compared with 'nopti':
> > 
> > randread IOPS on latest linus tree:
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > | randread IOPS     | randread IOPS with 'nopti'|
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > | 928K              | 1372K                     |
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> 
> Do you know if your CPU has PCID? It would be interesting to see these tests
> on older CPUs or older kernels without PCID support.

My CPU has PCID, which can be retrieved via /proc/cpuinfo.

And the above test is run on same kernel binary, and the result is just done
between 'nopti' and no 'nopti' in kernel command line.

Thanks,
Ming



More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list