[PATCH V3 1/2] nvme: split resetting state into reset_prepate and resetting

[jianchao.wang]

Hi max

Thanks for your kindly response and comment.

On 01/15/2018 09:28 PM, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
>>>
>>
>> setting RESET_PREPARE here??
>>
>> Also, the error recovery code is mutually excluded from reset_work
>> by trying to set the same state which is protected by the ctrl state
>> machine, so a similar change is needed there.
> 
> Sagi,
> Do you mean to add this (if so, I agree):
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> index d06641b..44ef52a 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> @@ -957,6 +957,12 @@ static void nvme_rdma_error_recovery_work(struct work_struct *work)
>     struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl = container_of(work,
>             struct nvme_rdma_ctrl, err_work);
> 
> +   if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_RESETING)) {
> +       /* state change failure should never happen */
> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +       return;
> +   }
> +
>     nvme_stop_keep_alive(&ctrl->ctrl);
> 
>     if (ctrl->ctrl.queue_count > 1) {
> @@ -989,7 +995,7 @@ static void nvme_rdma_error_recovery_work(struct work_struct *work)
> 
>  static void nvme_rdma_error_recovery(struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *ctrl)
>  {
> -   if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_RESETTING))
> +   if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_RESET_PREPARE))
>         return;
> 
>     queue_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->err_work);
> @@ -1760,6 +1766,12 @@ static void nvme_rdma_reset_ctrl_work(struct work_struct *work)
>     int ret;
>     bool changed;
> 
> +   if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_RESETING)) {
> +       /* state change failure should never happen */
> +       WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +       return;
> +   }
> +
>     nvme_stop_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl);
>     nvme_rdma_shutdown_ctrl(ctrl, false);

RESET_PREPARE state should include not only the scheduling gap of reset_work, but also
the device disable procedure.  All the previous state and work are cleared and canceled, 
then start new one. It is a very obvious boundary there. 
 
nvme_stop_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl);
  nvme_rdma_shutdown_ctrl(ctrl, false);
 +   if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl, NVME_CTRL_RESETING)) {
 +       /* state change failure should never happen */
 +       WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 +       return;
 +   }
What do you think about ? :)

Thanks
Jianchao