[PATCH v2 5/6] lightnvm: remove nvm_dev_ops->max_phys_sect
Javier Gonzalez
javier at cnexlabs.com
Mon Feb 19 03:05:17 PST 2018
> On 19 Feb 2018, at 08.31, Matias Bjørling <mb at lightnvm.io> wrote:
>
> On 02/16/2018 07:48 AM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>> On 15 Feb 2018, at 05.11, Matias Bjørling <mb at lightnvm.io> wrote:
>>>
>>> The value of max_phys_sect is always static. Instead of
>>> defining it in the nvm_dev_ops structure, declare it as a global
>>> value.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matias Bjørling <mb at lightnvm.io>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/lightnvm/core.c | 28 +++++++---------------------
>>> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-init.c | 9 ++++-----
>>> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-recovery.c | 8 ++------
>>> drivers/nvme/host/lightnvm.c | 5 +----
>>> include/linux/lightnvm.h | 5 ++---
>>> 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>> The patch looks good, but I have a question. If a target implements the
>> scalar interface, then it will not be limited to 64 lbas/ppas and it
>> will not make sense to split the bio base don this value. In fact, it
>> looks like in time, we will move to a scalar interface in the 2.0 path
>> to align with the zoned interface, so this value will be dependent on
>> whether the target is using the scalar or vector interface.
>
> Both read/write and vector interface will coexist. I am only removing
> what is hardwired into the specification.
>
> The read/write interface has always been able issue more than 64 LBAs,
> it is instead limited by what the hardware reports its max transfer
> size to be.
>
Exactly. I was thinking of a similar mechanism for the vector interface
to simplify integration with the scalar interface and avoid having an
if/else for what we now call max_phys_sect.
I guess we can wait and see what the code looks like when we adapt pblk.
Reviewed-by: Javier González <javier at cnexlabs.com>
Javier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/attachments/20180219/3e1e46fe/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list