NVMf (NVME over fabrics) Performance
Sagi Grimberg
sagi at grimberg.me
Wed Sep 21 11:17:58 PDT 2016
> Hi All,
Hey Kiru,
> I am working on measuring the NVMf (with Mellanox ConnectX-3 pro(40Gps)
> and Intel P3600) performance numbers on my 2 servers with 32 CPU each
> (64GB RAM).
>
> These are the numbers I am getting from IOPS perspective for Read, and for
> 4K size I/O’s
>
> 1 NULL block-devices using NVMf = 600K
> 2 NULL block-device using NVMf = 600k (not growing linearly per device)
Can you recognize if any side is blocked by CPU (it shouldn't).
Are all cores active in the target system?
is irqbalancer running?
Do you have register_always modparam turned on in nvme-rdma? Can you
try without it?
> 1 Intel NVME device through NVMf= 450K
> 2 Intel NVME device through NVMf = 470K (There is no increase in IOPs
> beyond 500K by adding more devices)
Can you try the latest code in 4.8-rc7?
As a second experiment can you try this patch applied (submitted to
linux-rdma lately)?
---
drivers/infiniband/core/device.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
index 760ef603a468..15f4bdf89fe1 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
@@ -999,8 +999,7 @@ static int __init ib_core_init(void)
return -ENOMEM;
ib_comp_wq = alloc_workqueue("ib-comp-wq",
- WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
- WQ_UNBOUND_MAX_ACTIVE);
+ WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_SYSFS, 0);
if (!ib_comp_wq) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err;
--
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list