[PATCH 6/6] nvme/rdma: Make nvme_rdma_conn_rejected() more informative
Steve Wise
swise at opengridcomputing.com
Thu Oct 20 13:41:44 PDT 2016
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Wise [mailto:swise at opengridcomputing.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 2:51 PM
> To: 'Bart Van Assche'; 'Keith Busch'
> Cc: 'Jens Axboe'; 'Christoph Hellwig'; linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org; 'Sagi
> Grimberg'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/6] nvme/rdma: Make nvme_rdma_conn_rejected() more
> informative
>
> >
> > > On 10/20/2016 10:45 AM, Steve Wise wrote:
> > > > I agree. What if we add a helper function in the core to map the
> > > > event->status value to something human readable? That would at
> > > > least push this into the core. The nvme host really doesn't do
> > > > anything other than display a different message...
> > > >
> > > > Something like rdma_event_msg(), but using event->status.
> > >
> > > Hello Steve,
> > >
> > > It won't be possible to let rdma_event_msg() decode the NVME_RDMA_CM_*
> > > status unless a callback function that performs such decoding is passed
> > > to rdma_event_msg(). Since such an approach would work for translating a
> > > status into a message but not for any more advanced CM status handling
> > > my preference is to unify the calling conventions for IB/RoCE and iWARP
> > > CM reject callbacks.
> >
> > I think for this particular case, mapping event->status to a string is all
> > that nvme needs. And having a status to string mapping would be easy to
> > do
> > in the core. I agree though, that unifying the status codes is a "good
> > thing".
>
> What about something along these lines? (untested and mangled by my emailer,
> but you get the point)
And here is a proposed change to nvme_rdma to use rdma_reject_msg(). If you like this idea, I'll send out these two patches, or send them to you to include in your series.
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
index 601aecf..41a2d4c 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
@@ -1237,18 +1237,19 @@ out_destroy_queue_ib:
static int nvme_rdma_conn_rejected(struct nvme_rdma_queue *queue,
struct rdma_cm_event *ev)
{
+ short nvme_status = -1;
+
if (ev->param.conn.private_data_len) {
struct nvme_rdma_cm_rej *rej =
(struct nvme_rdma_cm_rej *)ev->param.conn.private_data;
- dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device,
- "Connect rejected, status %d.", le16_to_cpu(rej->sts));
- /* XXX: Think of something clever to do here... */
- } else {
- dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device,
- "Connect rejected, no private data.\n");
+ nvme_status = le16_to_cpu(rej->sts);
}
+ dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device, "Connect rejected: status %d (%s) "
+ "nvme status %d.\n", ev->status,
+ rdma_reject_msg(queue->cm_id, ev->status), nvme_status);
+
return -ECONNRESET;
}
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list