[PATCH] nvme: Stop probing a removed device

Jens Axboe axboe at fb.com
Wed Oct 12 08:26:31 PDT 2016

On 10/12/2016 09:16 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:40:57AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 10/11/2016 11:31 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> There is no reason the nvme controller can ever return all 1's from
>>> reading the CSTS register. This patch returns an error if we observe
>>> that status. Without this, we may incorrectly proceed with controller
>>> initialization and unnecessarilly rely on error handling to clean this.
>> Applied for this series.
>> Due to being away for a bit, I'm currently a bit behind on patches. I'll
>> be going over those today. But if you, or anyone else, have things
>> pending that I haven't picked up yet, do send me a ping.
> Thanks! From me, I have two small patches I think are good to go, with
> reviews from Christoph and others:
> IO queue deltion fix:
>   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_pipermail_linux-2Dnvme_2016-2DOctober_006549.html&d=DQIBAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=cK1a7KivzZRh1fKQMjSm2A&m=USHj4BTLL7XH6RKDrQcfVaoEtYrs9X7WlWp86a7V7T4&s=g1WSuwsvtlK6IgJlP3yBlW4tiSJXSRgm_rgADvHVYVA&e=

Hand applied (last hunk reject).

> Double reset fix:
>   https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.infradead.org_pipermail_linux-2Dnvme_2016-2DOctober_006524.html&d=DQIBAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=cK1a7KivzZRh1fKQMjSm2A&m=USHj4BTLL7XH6RKDrQcfVaoEtYrs9X7WlWp86a7V7T4&s=Fv5eRNi1aBBJhmPHkNJhteHMxe_yylooeBA5-uJEkQs&e=

Applied 1/2 - you mentioned a v2 of 2/2, and it doesn't apply since it
actually conflicts with the very patch referenced above.

Jens Axboe

More information about the Linux-nvme mailing list