[PATCH v2 RFC] nvme: improve performance for virtual NVMe devices

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 01:48:43PM -0300, Helen Koike wrote:
> 1) I predict the command Set Doorbell/EventIdx Memory in the proposal,
> should have an Unset command?

Why would you unset it?  What's probably more important is to define
that you do / do not need to set it again after a reset.  Probably the
former.

> 2) What should be filled in the function field in figure 40?

Probably nothing for now, just let the editor update it.

> 3) In the original patch, the command Set Doorbell/EventIdx Memory is
> assumed to be performed after all the queues are created, then what should
> happen if a queue is created after this command? We should abort the create
> queue command? Or we should first unset the doorbel/eventIdx memory then
> create the queues and then set it again? Or we just change the original
> proposal and if the controller has this functionality, it should support
> queues being created after the Set Doorbell/EventIdx Memory command?
> Personally I think the controller should support creating queues after the
> Set Doorbell/EventIdx Memory command was performed, what do you think?

I would not treat it any different than the existing doorbell registers,
which have the same issue.  NVMe allows you to create I/O queues
any time, but you better get the sizing of the bar / memory right
for the maximum possible number of queues allocated.