[PATCH v2 nvme-cli 3/4] fabrics: Allow discover params to come from a conf file
J Freyensee
james_p_freyensee at linux.intel.com
Mon Aug 8 14:29:15 PDT 2016
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 15:35 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 02:57:59PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >
> > Allow the user to just run "nvme discover" or "nvme connect-all"
> > in case it finds a default /etc/nvme/nvmf_disc conf file.
>
> Hmm, can just call this /etc/nvme/discovery.conf or something else
> that rolls easier off the hand?
Yah, similar to my last nitpick comment, I like this a tad better
because we don't even have to mention nvmf/nvmeof.
I'd still like to see example documentation in the header patch of what
the resulting .conf file contents could look like.
>
> >
> > +static int discover_from_conf_file(const char *desc, char *argstr,
> > + const struct argconfig_commandline_options *opts, bool
> > connect)
>
> Second tab for the argument indent please.
>
> >
> > + err = build_options(argstr, BUF_SIZE);
> > + if (err) {
> > + ret = err;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + err = do_discover(argstr, connect);
> > + if (err) {
> > + ret = err;
> > + continue;
> > + }
>
> How will diagnostics look like here if the file has incorrect
> syntax?
Dido. Be nice to know what argstr/parameter broke.
>
> >
> > + if (!cfg.transport && !cfg.traddr) {
> > + return discover_from_conf_file(desc, argstr,
> > + command_line_options, connect);
>
> Maybe we want a separate options that says the option needs to be
> read from a config file, e.g. --file with an optional argument
> for the file name?
Are you thinking that there could be a single system that is acting
like multiple hosts, therefore each "host/hostnqn" could use a separate
.conf file for connection?
If that is the case, then it may be a little confusing if there was a
single /etc/nvme/hostnqn filename that existed.
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list