[PATCH] nvmet-rdma: Don't use the inline buffer in order to avoid allocation for small reads

[Sagi Grimberg]

>> that is currently being sent (its a rare race condition, but
>> theoretically possible). The reason is that we repost the inline data
>> buffer for receive before we post the send request. We used to have
>
> ?? The same buffer is posted at the same time for send and recv? That
> is never OK, SRQ or not.

I agree.

But I agree its a shame to lose this. Maybe if we over-allocate cmds
and restore the receive repost to be after the send completion? I'm not
too fond of that either (it's not just commands but also inline
pages...)