[PATCH v6 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same}

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:44:11AM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> I just did a quick test with a Samsung 900G NVMe device.
> mkfs.xfs is OK on 4.3-rc5.
> 
> What's your device model? I may find a similar one to try.

This is a HGST Ultrastar SN100

Analsys and tentativ fix below:

blktrace for before the commit:

259,0    1        2     0.000002543  2394  G   D 0 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    1        3     0.000008230  2394  I   D 0 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    1        4     0.000031090   207  D   D 0 + 8388607 [kworker/1:1H]
259,0    1        5     0.000044869  2394  Q   D 8388607 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    1        6     0.000045992  2394  G   D 8388607 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    1        7     0.000049559  2394  I   D 8388607 + 8388607 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    1        8     0.000061551   207  D   D 8388607 + 8388607 [kworker/1:1H]

.. and so on.

blktrace with the commit:

259,0    2        1     0.000000000  1228  Q   D 0 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    2        2     0.000002543  1228  G   D 0 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    2        3     0.000010080  1228  I   D 0 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    2        4     0.000082187   267  D   D 0 + 4194304 [kworker/2:1H]
259,0    2        5     0.000224869  1228  Q   D 4194304 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    2        6     0.000225835  1228  G   D 4194304 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    2        7     0.000229457  1228  I   D 4194304 + 4194304 [mkfs.xfs]
259,0    2        8     0.000238507   267  D   D 4194304 + 4194304 [kworker/2:1H]

So discards are smaller, but better aligned.  Now if I tweak a single
line in blk-lib.c to be able to use all of bi_size I get the old I/O
pattern back and everything works fine again:

diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index bd40292..65b61dc 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 			break;
 		}
 
-		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, MAX_BIO_SECTORS);
+		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, UINT_MAX >> 9);
 		end_sect = sector + req_sects;
 
 		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;