[PATCH] NVMe: Increase shutdown complete time
Robles, Raymond C
raymond.c.robles at intel.com
Mon Mar 31 16:37:30 EDT 2014
You're probably fine waiting anywhere up to CAP.TO.
-----Original Message-----
From: Linux-nvme [mailto:linux-nvme-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Dan McLeran
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 11:57 AM
To: Busch, Keith
Cc: linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NVMe: Increase shutdown complete time
Seems reasonable to me.
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Keith Busch wrote:
> The spec doesn't have a recommendation for shutdown beyond "that the
> host wait a minimum of one second for the shutdown operations to
> complete", so we need to choose an arbitrarily value so we don't wait
> forever but high enough to prevent unsafe shutdowns. Some h/w vendors
> say the previous two seconds is not long enough at some capacities.
> Twenty seconds ought to be enough for anybody, right?
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/nvme-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> index 625259d..103da93 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nvme-core.c
> @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ static int nvme_shutdown_ctrl(struct nvme_dev *dev)
> cc = (readl(&dev->bar->cc) & ~NVME_CC_SHN_MASK) | NVME_CC_SHN_NORMAL;
> writel(cc, &dev->bar->cc);
>
> - timeout = 2 * HZ + jiffies;
> + timeout = 20 * HZ + jiffies;
> while ((readl(&dev->bar->csts) & NVME_CSTS_SHST_MASK) !=
> NVME_CSTS_SHST_CMPLT) {
> msleep(100);
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvme mailing list
> Linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org
> http://merlin.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org
http://merlin.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
More information about the Linux-nvme
mailing list