[PATCH v2 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for panic writes
sashiko-bot at kernel.org
sashiko-bot at kernel.org
Tue Oct 13 07:27:10 PDT 2026
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] pm: spi-mem: mishandled pm_runtime_get_if_active() silently breaks panic write
- [High] mm: spi-nor: panic write allocation uses sleeping GFP mask
- [High] spi: spi-mem: panic write fallback path sleeps on ENOTSUPP
--
commit a1f9f053470ff10fa10c133dc5aeb0827bc367a1
Author: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay at marvell.com>
mtd: spi-nor: Add support for panic writes
If the SPI controller supports it, provide the functionality of doing a
panic write.
Update the spi-nor core code and controllers to make sure they won't try
to grab locked mutexes or sleep when doing a panic write, as preemption
and IRQs are disabled.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 2509fb983d4f2..281acc54b3245 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2196,6 +2235,7 @@ static int spi_nor_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
> static int spi_nor_octal_dtr_write(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, size_t len,
> const u8 *buf)
> {
> + gfp_t mm_flags = GFP_KERNEL;
> u8 *tmp_buf;
> size_t bytes_written;
> loff_t start, end;
> @@ -2204,7 +2244,10 @@ static int spi_nor_octal_dtr_write(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, size_t len,
> if (IS_ALIGNED(to, 2) && IS_ALIGNED(len, 2))
> return spi_nor_write_data(nor, to, len, buf);
>
> - tmp_buf = kmalloc(nor->params->page_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (nor->mtd.oops_panic_write)
> + mm_flags |= GFP_ATOMIC;
> +
> + tmp_buf = kmalloc(nor->params->page_size, mm_flags);
[Severity: High]
Does this bitwise OR successfully remove the sleepable __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM
flag?
Because mm_flags is initialized to GFP_KERNEL (which includes
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM), bitwise ORing GFP_ATOMIC into the mask does not
clear the __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM bit. This means the resulting mask still
instructs the page allocator that it is allowed to sleep and enter direct
reclaim.
Since panic writes execute in a strictly atomic context with preemption and
local interrupts disabled, could this trigger a bug or deadlock and prevent
the oops log from being saved?
[ ... ]
> @@ -3589,8 +3652,13 @@ static int spi_nor_set_mtd_info(struct spi_nor *nor)
> mtd->size = nor->params->size;
> mtd->_read = spi_nor_read;
> /* Might be already set by some SST flashes. */
> - if (!mtd->_write)
> + if (!mtd->_write) {
> mtd->_write = spi_nor_write;
> + if (nor->spimem &&
> + spi_mem_controller_is_capable(nor->spimem->spi->controller, panic_write)) {
> + mtd->_panic_write = spi_nor_panic_write;
> + }
> + }
[Severity: Critical]
By hooking up panic write here, this delegates to spi_mem_exec_op() in
drivers/spi/spi-mem.c, which seems to mishandle the runtime pm reference
for panic writes.
In spi_mem_exec_op(), the panic write path does:
else if (ctlr->auto_runtime_pm)
ret = pm_runtime_get_if_active(ctlr->dev.parent);
if (ret)
return ret;
Since pm_runtime_get_if_active() returns 1 if the device is active, this
catches the success case (1) as an error and returns immediately, skipping
ctlr->mem_ops->exec_op() and leaking the pm reference.
Conversely, if the device was suspended, it returns 0, execution continues
on the suspended controller, and the subsequent pm_runtime_put_noidle() will
underflow the usage count.
Does this silently break the panic write execution?
[Severity: High]
Additionally, if the controller's exec_op() method dynamically returns
-ENOTSUPP or -EOPNOTSUPP, spi_mem_exec_op() falls back to a path that
cannot execute in atomic context:
tmpbuf = kzalloc(tmpbufsize, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
...
ret = spi_sync(mem->spi, &msg);
Both kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL) and spi_sync() can sleep. If this fallback is
triggered during a panic write, will it violate atomic context constraints
and deadlock?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013141350.189996-1-paul.cercueil@bootlin.com?part=3
More information about the linux-mtd
mailing list