[PATCH v4 07/27] mtd: spi-nor: swp: Explain the MEMLOCK ioctl implementation behaviour

[Miquel Raynal]

>> +/*
>> + * These ioctls behave according to the following rules:
>> + * ->lock(): Never locks more than what is requested, ie. may lock less
>> + * ->unlock(): Never unlocks more than what is requested, ie. may unlock less
>> + * -is_locked(): Checks if the region is *fully* locked, returns false otherwise.
>> + *               This feeback may be misleading because users may get an "unlocked"
>> + *               status even though a subpart of the region is effectively locked.
>> + */
>
> We already have some text where struct spi_nor_locking_ops is defined.
> Can we move this information there?

Ok, I will udpate the position of the comment.

Thanks,
Miquèl