[PATCH RFC 4/7] mtd: spinand: toshiba: Add RX sampling delay values

[Frieder Schrempf]

On 09.03.26 16:12, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> 
>> @@ -277,7 +291,7 @@ static const struct spinand_info toshiba_spinand_table[] = {
>>  					      &update_cache_variants),
>>  		     0,
>>  		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&tx58cxgxsxraix_ooblayout,
>> -				     tx58cxgxsxraix_ecc_get_status)),
>> +				     tx58cxgxsxraix_ecc_get_status),
>>  	/* 1.8V 4Gb (1st generation) */
>>  	SPINAND_INFO("TH58NYG2S3HBAI4",
>>  		     SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0xAC),
>> @@ -288,7 +302,7 @@ static const struct spinand_info toshiba_spinand_table[] = {
>>  					      &update_cache_x4_variants),
>>  		     SPINAND_HAS_QE_BIT,
>>  		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&tx58cxgxsxraix_ooblayout,
>> -				     tx58cxgxsxraix_ecc_get_status)),
>> +				     tx58cxgxsxraix_ecc_get_status),
>>  	/* 1.8V 8Gb (1st generation) */
>>  	SPINAND_INFO("TH58NYG3S0HBAI6",
>>  		     SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0xA3),
>> @@ -299,7 +313,7 @@ static const struct spinand_info toshiba_spinand_table[] = {
>>  					      &update_cache_x4_variants),
>>  		     SPINAND_HAS_QE_BIT,
>>  		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&tx58cxgxsxraix_ooblayout,
>> -				     tx58cxgxsxraix_ecc_get_status)),
>> +				     tx58cxgxsxraix_ecc_get_status),
>>  };
> 
> Are these 3 changes legitimate?

No, they are not. This is a last-minute fixup gone wrong.