[PATCH] ubifs: using vmalloc_array() to handle the code

[tanze]

Change array_size() to vmalloc_array(), Due to vmalloc_array()
is optimized better,uses fewer instructions, and handles
overflow more concisely

Signed-off-by: tanze <tanze at kylinos.cn>
---
 fs/ubifs/lpt.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/lpt.c b/fs/ubifs/lpt.c
index 441d0beca4cf..dde0aa3287f4 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/lpt.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/lpt.c
@@ -628,8 +628,8 @@ int ubifs_create_dflt_lpt(struct ubifs_info *c, int *main_lebs, int lpt_first,
 	pnode = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ubifs_pnode), GFP_KERNEL);
 	nnode = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ubifs_nnode), GFP_KERNEL);
 	buf = vmalloc(c->leb_size);
-	ltab = vmalloc(array_size(sizeof(struct ubifs_lpt_lprops),
-				  c->lpt_lebs));
+	ltab = vmalloc_array(c->lpt_lebs,
+			     sizeof(struct ubifs_lpt_lprops));
 	if (!pnode || !nnode || !buf || !ltab || !lsave) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
@@ -1777,8 +1777,8 @@ static int lpt_init_rd(struct ubifs_info *c)
 {
 	int err, i;
 
-	c->ltab = vmalloc(array_size(sizeof(struct ubifs_lpt_lprops),
-				     c->lpt_lebs));
+	c->ltab = vmalloc_array(c->lpt_lebs,
+				sizeof(struct ubifs_lpt_lprops));
 	if (!c->ltab)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -1846,8 +1846,8 @@ static int lpt_init_wr(struct ubifs_info *c)
 {
 	int err, i;
 
-	c->ltab_cmt = vmalloc(array_size(sizeof(struct ubifs_lpt_lprops),
-					 c->lpt_lebs));
+	c->ltab_cmt = vmalloc_array(c->lpt_lebs,
+				    sizeof(struct ubifs_lpt_lprops));
 	if (!c->ltab_cmt)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.25.1